USDA Issues Mandatory Electronic Dairy Product Price Reporting Rule

USDA issued on February 15th the final rule for the mandatory electronic dairy product price reporting, whichappeared in the Federal Register.

The rule was mostly unchanged from the proposed rule issued last July, and did several things that NMPF had supported:

  • It completed the move of dairy product price reporting from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) to the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS).  AMS staff are more familiar with the reporting plants and their operations, and so are better equipped to integrate data collection and audit.
  • It makes reporting completely web-based, which would speed the data collection process.
  • It moves up the plant reporting deadline each week from noon (local time) on Wednesday to noon (local time) on Tuesday, with some adjustments for when Monday or Tuesday fell on a holiday.
  • It moves up USDA’s normal publication deadline each week from 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday to 3:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday, again with possible adjustment for holidays.
  • Beginning April 18, Federal order price announcements will also move from Friday to 3:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday, allowing about 40% of Class price announcements to be based on more current data than they were before.

The last Dairy Product Prices report will be issued by NASS for the last time on Friday, March 30. The following week, on Wednesday, April 4, it will be issued by AMS for the first time.

New product price reporting and announcement schedules and information about the new data collection system were posted on the AMS website.

 

NMPF Board of Directors Prepare to Convene for Spring Meeting

Members of NMPF's Board of Directors will assemble March 12 – 13 at the Ritz-Carlton Pentagon City hotel in Arlington, Virginia for their spring meeting. Please note that the date is a week later than it has been for the past several years.

Committee meetings will begin at 1:00 pm on the 12th, including the Political Action Committee meeting, the Dues & Budget Committee Meeting, and the Officers Meeting. The day will conclude with a membership reception. The full Board of Directors meeting will start at 8:00 am on the 13th.

Anyone with questions about the Board of Directors meeting should contact Anuja Miner.

 

Agriculture Coalition Leads Dialogue About Food Production

The U.S. Farmers & Ranchers Alliance (USFRA) is a coalition of more than 70 farmer- and rancher-led organizations and agricultural partners who have come together to open a conversation about how our food is grown and raised. NMPF is one of the active members of this coalition, whose participants are collaborating to lead the dialogue and answer Americans’ questions about how we raise our food.

The stories and experiences of real farmers and ranchers are often left out of the conversations happening around American food production, so USFRA is committed to helping consumers connect with farmers and ranchers to enrich the information available. One method of doing so is by contributing electronically to the conversation through the USFRA’s website, www.fooddialogues.com. The Food Dialogues program involves public forums, local and national events, and an ongoing discussion on the website – all with the goal of creating an open conversation.

USFRA has also organized a forum next Wednesday, the National Agriculture Day Dialogue, as part of the commemoration of Ag Day. Innovation is critical to the future of farming and ranching, but many people fear technology in agriculture. The fact that many people think farming should “go back” to the way it was done in the past is an issue that will be tackled at this Food Dialogues forum, which will be held March 7th on Capitol Hill. USFRA has invited many organizations from outside the agriculture community to attend and participate in the dialogue — groups like Consumers Union, American Humane Association, American Veterinary Medical Association, and even Meals on Wheels. There will be dialogue and conversation among everyone interested in food and how our food is produced.

 

Congressional Representatives Insist on Resolving India Trade Blockade

This week, a coalition of 41 representatives sent a letter to the Administration that expressed concern with the prohibition against U.S. dairy exports into India. NMPF worked with the Congressional Dairy Farmer Caucus Co-Chairs to help send this important message to the U.S. Trade Representative, USDA, and the Commerce Department regarding access of unjustified barriers to U.S. dairy products being sold in one of the world’s fastest growing markets.

NMPF has collaborated with the U.S. Dairy Export Council for many years to try to resolve this problem, but India has persisted in its insistence on holding imported products to unscientifically-based requirements. The letter urges the Administration to prioritize resolution of the issue, including during the upcoming meetings that Commerce Secretary John Bryson is holding in India later this month.

 

Nominations Open for Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Federal Advisory Committee

EPA announced an invitation for nominations for the Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Federal Advisory Committee (FRRCC). The FRRCC, a federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, provides independent advice to the EPA Administrator on a variety of environmental issues facing agriculture and rural community. The committee consists of representatives from academia, farm groups, food industry, non-governmental organizations, and state, local and tribal governments.

EPA specifically encourages nominations from people actively engaged in farming or ranching. In addition, EPA requests the candidates possess the following:

  • Extensive professional knowledge of agricultural issues and environmental policy;
  • A demonstrated ability to examine and analyze complicated environmental issues with objectivity and integrity;
  • Excellent interpersonal as well as oral and written communication skills;
  • An ability and willingness to participate in a deliberative and collaborative process;
  • Must be prepared to process a substantial amount of complex and technical information; and,
  • Have the ability to volunteer approximately 10 to 15 hours per month to the Committee’s activities, including participation in teleconference meetings and preparation of text for Committee reports.

Applicants are encouraged to submit all nominations materials by March 15, 2012. For more details on the FRRCC and information on how to submit nominations, please visit the Federal Register notice from February 13 or contact Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; telephone: (202) 564-7273.

 

NMPF Accepting Applications for 2012 Scholarship Program

NMPF is now accepting applications for its National Dairy Leadership Scholarship Program for academic year 2012-2013.

Each year, NMPF awards four to five scholarships to outstanding graduate students (enrolled in Master’s or Ph.D. programs) who are actively pursuing dairy-related fields of research that are of immediate interest to NMPF member cooperatives and the US dairy industry at large.

Graduate students pursuing research of direct benefit to milk marketing cooperatives and dairy producers are encouraged to submit an application (applicants do not need to be members of NMPF to qualify). The top scholarship applicant will be awarded the Hintz Memorial Scholarship, which was created in 2005 in honor of the late Cass-Clay Creamery Board Chairman Murray Hintz who was instrumental in establishing NMPF’s scholarship program.

Recommended fields of study include but are not limited to Agriculture Communications and Journalism, Animal Health, Animal and/or Human Nutrition, Bovine Genetics, Dairy Products Processing, Dairy Science, Economics, Environmental Science, Food Science, Food Safety, Herd Management, and Marketing and Price Analysis. Applications must be received no later than Friday, May 4, 2012. For an application or more information, pleasevisit the NMPF website or call the NMPF office at 703-243-6111.

 

The Right-Sized Answer

Deprecated: Call-time pass-by-reference has been deprecated in C:\xampp\htdocs\anand\drupal5\includes\theme.inc on line 171

The latest annual summary from USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service on farm and livestock operations contains some interesting numbers about dairy production – and it’s worth exploring the data a bit more because of its policy implications.

First, all of the figures I am citing are contained in the NASS “Farms, Land in Farms, and Livestock Operations, 2011 Summary,” which was released by USDA last month. This yearly report certainly makes plain the ongoing trend of American agriculture of the past 100+ years, wherein farms have gotten larger, even as there are fewer of them. There’s no new news in that.

Thus, it’s no surprise that the USDA assessment finds a gradual, ongoing reduction in the number of dairy operations. The USDA reports that in 2011 there were 60,000 dairy operations – which it liberally defines as any farm with a milk cow, whether that farm actually sells milk commercially or not. Using a more precise and limited definition of a dairy farm – one which actually is licensed to sell milk – the report finds that there were 51,481 dairies in the U.S. in 2011.

But behind USDA’s aggregate sum of dairy farms is an important fact: in 2011, for the first time, more than half of the U.S. milk supply (50.3%) was produced on farms with at least 1,000 cows – and more than one-third (34.6%) of the milk supply came from the 800 farms with over 2,000 head. To put those numbers in perspective, there are 950 operations with between 1,000 and 2,000 cows, along with those 800 in the 2,000+ range.

Hence, three percent of all U.S. dairy farms, 1,750 commercial operations in all, produce half the milk. There are an additional 1,650 farms in the range of 500 to 999 cows, accounting for another 12.6% of U.S. milk production. The bottom line is that six percent of the farms generate more than 60 percent of the milk supply.

That said, each of those farms is a small business, and none is exactly alike. And the concentration and scale of dairy production is no different than other sectors of agriculture, nor is it substantially distinct from other parts of the economy. The 80/20 rule, where 20% of businesses tend to generate 80% of commerce, applies to most walks of life, and dairy farming is no exception.

But this type of scale has important policy implications. As more of our milk – indeed, the majority of it – comes from larger farms, we need safety net programs that don’t discriminate based on size or volume of milk output. Unfortunately, that’s not the case right now, with MILC payments capped on the first three million pounds of milk production.

This is why NMPF has been backing H.R. 3062, Dairy Security Act, which contains a margin protection program that doesn’t limit coverage levels or insurance payments to a certain size. We can’t afford to leave exposed a significant chunk of our milk supply without a reasonable safety net under it. No other business sector would tolerate that kind of liability, and our government farm policy needs to take a clue from the private sector and be mindful of the consequences that come when policies overtly make vulnerable an important national food resource.

We also need mindful that other aspects of economic regulation, from labor policies to environmental safeguards, are also impacted by, and will affect, the scope of milk production, and the places and sizes of farms from where we get most of our milk.

It’s also important that we be mindful that while larger farms produce a lot of milk, most dairy operations are smaller in scale, and they deserve representation and a favorable regulatory climate as well. There’s no right answer to the question of how large a farm should be, and it’s a mistake if we let our industry get diverted in trying to provide only one response. Working together, dairy farmers of all sizes can achieve a great deal; it’s only when we have family fights about these issues that we lose our effectiveness, and that’s a big loss for everyone.

 

New Report on New Zealand’s Dairy Export Monopoly Highlights U.S. Concerns about Expanding U.S.-New Zealand Dairy Trade

ARLINGTON, VA – The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) said today that a new report on the anti-competitive practices pervasive in the New Zealand dairy industry highlights why the U.S. dairy farmer sector is so concerned with including U.S.-New Zealand dairy trade in a potential Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement (FTA). The issue is one that NMPF has addressed through its comments to the Obama Administration on TPP, including in its 2010 testimony to the U.S. International Trade Commission. NMPF applauded the new report’s effort to shed more light on this critical concern.

The report in question was prepared by the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) and provided confidentially to the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (a summary of the report is available online). The accompanying letter notes that New Zealand’s largest company has been provided special privileges by the government that enable it to maintain a roughly 90% market share of the milk produced in New Zealand. This advantageous position has given this single dairy company direct control of more than one third of world dairy trade, without even accounting for the additional sales controlled through its many production and distributor relationships around the world.

NMPF has been strongly supportive of the overall TPP negotiations, working to pursue favorable opportunities where they exist for U.S. dairy producers. NMPF has identified the possible future inclusion of dairy negotiations with Japan and Canada as being among the most significant new openings TPP could ultimately offer, although it is not yet clear if or when those countries will join TPP and under what terms.

However, NMPF has been equally clear about dairy producers’ continued vehement opposition to any expansion of U.S.-New Zealand dairy trade as part of that effort, given New Zealand’s dairy market concentration and its dominating firm’s tremendous global market power. NMPF has estimated that U.S. dairy farmers could face $20 billion in losses during the first decade of the FTA if U.S. dairy tariffs are fully eliminated for New Zealand’s benefit.

“New Zealand’s government and dairy industry have been teaming up to spend considerable resources in courting members of the U.S. Congress on the TPP, but our representatives need to keep in mind the harsh realities of the global dairy industry, where trade is dominated by one company,” said Jerry Kozak, President and CEO of NMPF. “And that dominion has been facilitated by New Zealand’s policy of granting a market concentration exemption to a single company, allowing it to sway both internal and external dairy markets.”

Kozak said that in addition to NMPF’s support for TPP talks, the organization has also been supportive of the vast majority of past U.S. trade agreements, which have led to important gains that benefit U.S. dairy producers. NMPF’s position with respect to U.S.-New Zealand dairy trade is in keeping with a commitment to address not only tariff barriers to U.S. dairy sales, but also major non-tariff measures that negatively impact the U.S.’s ability to fairly compete both at home and abroad.

NMPF will continue to work with USDEC in asking Trade Representative Ron Kirk, other trade officials in the Obama Administration, and members of Congress, to insist on the importance of expanding U.S. exports and facilitating trade. It will continue to oppose any expansion of U.S.-New Zealand dairy trade under TPP, given the very troubling dynamics that persist in that country’s dairy industry.

The National Milk Producers Federation, based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the well being of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s 31 cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of more than 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies.

Addition of Butter Increases CWT Export Volume

Cooperatives Working Together (CWT) has added butter to the product list it will assist members in selling overseas, starting in January. Analysis of market fundamentals by CWT/NMPF economists indicated that the time was right to provide assistance to CWT member cooperatives interested in expanding sales of U.S. butter in foreign markets.

Members of CWT have responded strongly to the addition of this product line to the Export Assistance program. Requests for assistance were accepted from four CWT member cooperatives to export nearly 11 million pounds of butter to four countries to be delivered through June.

In addition, in January CWT accepted 48 bids to export 13.2 million pounds of Cheddar, Gouda and Monterey Jack cheese to 10 countries. This product will be delivered from January through June.

CWT continues its effort to increase producer participation above 70% of the milk supply, with mailings to independent dairy farmers and cooperatives currently not investing in CWT.

 

NMPF Urges Greater Accountability by Commodity Brokers

The collapse of commodity broker MF Global has spurred Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow to seek recommendations from participants in the futures and derivatives markets.

In a recent letter to Senator Stabenow, NMPF shared the dairy industry’s distress that cash accounts of MF Global’s commodity customers were improperly used by the broker, and that only 72% of those accounts have been returned so far. Federal law gives commodity futures and options customers first claim on what they are owed from the broker’s bankruptcy, regardless of the broker’s failure to keep funds properly segregated. NMPF asked for the Senator’s support for that position, which has been taken up by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Finally, NMPF urged greater accountability by commodity brokers in the future, offered its support for CFTC’s new rules to tighten up protections for commodity customers’ cash accounts, and sought tougher enforcement and more severe penalties under those rules. All these positions are aimed at allowing dairy farmers – and their customers – to manage their risks without having to worry about the honesty of the middleman. If you have questions about these issues, please call Roger Cryan or Jonathon Glueck in the NMPF offices.

 

USDEC and NMPF Raise Concerns about Impact Reorganization Proposals on Trade Policy, Food Safety Agencies

NMPF has expressed concerns about the potential impact on U.S. dairy exports of a recent proposal to consolidate government agencies.

President Obama recently announced his proposal to reinstate the Office of the President’s authority to reorganize the government. His first proposed use of that authority would be to consolidate six agencies dealing with trade and commerce into one.

NMPF, and the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), praised the Administration’s effort to ensure that agencies involved in efforts related to trade are operating in the smoothest and most coordinated way possible. But they expressed deep concerns that including the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in the process could detrimentally affect U.S. ability to effectively negotiate and enforce trade agreements. Both organizations indicated that they supported the overall effort, but would oppose the inclusion of USTR in such a reorganization out of concern that it would damage the agency’s effectiveness.

“NMPF’s members want to see an efficiently operated and cost-effective U.S. government,” said Jerry Kozak, President and CEO of NMPF. “However, as we pursue the important goal of seeking greater government efficiencies, we need to ensure that this process does not undermine the ability of critical agencies to carry out their missions. In this instance, NMPF is very concerned that USTR’s unique role in trade negotiations and its superb level of openness to input from the public would be greatly harmed by submerging this agency within a larger bureaucracy.”

In a related issue, Office of Management and Budget Director for Management Jeff Zients stated that a subsequent effort would be to consolidate USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) with the food safety unit at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). NMPF and USDEC also noted with interest this proposal, which, as announced, would not directly impact dairy products, since only meat products are inspected by FSIS.

However, the statement did not reference what impact such a food safety consolidation might have on the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, which currently plays a key official role as a proxy for FDA on many export-related issues, given the lack of FDA mandate to address export matters. The fact that FDA is not charged with a responsibility for supporting U.S. food exports has in the past created unnecessary hurdles to resolving U.S. dairy export challenges, given FDA’s oversight of dairy products. NMPF and USDEC support efforts to rationalize FDA’s role with respect to exported products in order to most effectively make use of government oversight responsibilities.

 

NMPF Comments on Approaches to Reducing Sodium Consumption

In September 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) requested public comments, data and information relevant to the dietary intake of sodium and current approaches to promote sodium reduction. They are considering ways to promote gradual, achievable and sustainable reduction of sodium intake over time.

NMPF submitted comments last week, which highlighted:

  • The benefits of multiple interventions (including weight loss, physical activity, and diet) in reducing hypertension, rather than reduction of sodium consumption alone;
  • The multiple roles of sodium in cheese manufacture, the technological challenges in replacing sodium in cheese, and the labeling challenges with reducing sodium in cheese;
  • The voluntary and proactive efforts of the dairy industry to reduce sodium in cheese. NMPF urged FDA to avoid federal restrictions on sodium content in foods.

If you have any questions, please contact Beth Briczinski.